|
Authors: Shelley M, Harrison C, Coles B, Wilt TJ, Mason MD
Bottom Line:
This is a systematic review in progress.
Publication details:
The objective of the review is to determine the effectiveness and toxicity of chemotherapy in the management of hormone refractory prostate cancer and to undertake subgroup analysis, where data are available, to establish the efficacy of different chemotherapeutic regimes.
We assessed this page using an appraisal instrument developed by Minervation specifically for this project. This approach is still in development, so you should regard the assessments as a general guide. Click here to find out more, or to let us know how you think the approach could be improved.
Reliability comments:
- This is a systematic review in progress
- Website content is checked by relevant experts
- A clear statement about the website developers is required
- A robust quality control procedure is reported
Usability comments:
- The cover sheet for the protocol should appear first
- The left hand submenu could be more prominently displayed
- The website does not conform to web accessibility standards
- Poor layout
- Confusing and over-complicated for users
Scoring
Reliability
| Item |
Score |
| Is it clear who has developed the web site and what their objectives are? |
1 |
| Wiley Interscience appears all over the homepage of the Cochrane Library. There is an About Us section but this is hard to locate. |
| Does the site report a robust quality control procedure? |
3 |
|
|
| Is the page content checked by an expert? |
2 |
| Website content is checked by relevant experts. |
| Is the page updated regularly? |
2 |
| Content last assessed as up-to-date 9 July 2006. |
| Does the page cite relevant sources where appropriate? |
3 |
| The page cites some relevant sources. |
Usability
| Item |
Score |
| Is the site accessible without a login? |
3 |
| No registration required. |
| Does the site conform to web Accessibility standards? |
0 |
| Lida score 80% |
| Is the site design clear and transparent? |
0 |
| Very cluttered homepage, small font size, too many menu options. Very confusing. |
| Is the site design consistent from one page to another? |
1 |
| Not very consistent. |
| Can users find what they need on the site? |
1 |
| Just about. There is a browsing option but this is difficult to find and use. The search facility is confusing and it is difficult to view search results. |
| Is the format of information clear and appropriate for the audience? |
1 |
| The left hand submenu could be more prominently displayed. The cover sheet for the protocol should appear first |
| Weighted total (Usability + (Reliability x 2)): |
28 |
We score each question out of three where:
| 0 |
= Never or Can't tell |
| 1 |
= Sometimes or partly |
| 2 |
= Mostly |
| 3 |
= Always |
|
Chemotherapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (Cochrance Review)
