signpost iconProstate Cancer Risk Management: UK information pack

Authors: Watson E, Jenkins L, Bukach C, Austoker J

Bottom Line:

A comprehensive guide to the management of prostate cancer in primary care. Men requesting a PSA test should be given balanced information to help them decide whether they need a test.

Publication details:

The guide contains information about incidence, risk factors, clinical features, detection and diagnosis, treatments and guidance for referral and monitoring.

We assessed this page using an appraisal instrument developed by Minervation specifically for this project. This approach is still in development, so you should regard the assessments as a general guide. Click here to find out more, or to let us know how you think the approach could be improved.

Reliability comments:

  • The information is concise and evidence-based.
  • The content has been checked by relevant experts.
  • The page was published in July 2009.
  • Relevant sources are cited.
  • No About Us or site policy statement

Usability comments:

  • Very well presented document which is easy to interpret.
  • The website does not conform to web accessibility standards
  • Home page of this website is messy


Item Score
Is it clear who has developed the web site and what their objectives are? 1
There is an NHS logo on the homepage, but no information about the National Screening Committee or an About Us section.
Does the site report a robust quality control procedure? 0
There is no methodology section or any description of how information is out together.
Is the page content checked by an expert? 3
The content has been checked by relevant experts.
Is the page updated regularly? 2
The page was published in July 2009.
Does the page cite relevant sources where appropriate? 3
Relevant sources are cited.
Item Score
Is the site accessible without a login? 3
No registration required.
Does the site conform to web Accessibility standards? 2
Lida score 81%
Is the site design clear and transparent? 1
The homepage is very messy. It is hard to tell which is the main menu. Sub menus appear on the right hand side and are not very obvious. The ordering of topics in the submenus seems arbitrary. No breadcrumbs are used to guide users. Background colour of web pages makes it a strain to read the text.
Is the site design consistent from one page to another? 2
Yes, there is general consistency in the poor design of this site!
Can users find what they need on the site? 1
Despite the cluttered homepage there are links to the prostate cancer area, so users can find the right section. However, the prostate submenu is in a poor position so users may not see the subheadings. There is a search box. Results are displayed poorly and it is unclear how they are ranked. There is no site map
Is the format of information clear and appropriate for the audience? 2
PDF only
Weighted total (Usability + (Reliability x 2)): 29
We score each question out of three where:
0 = Never or Can't tell
1 = Sometimes or partly
2 = Mostly
3 = Always

Date rated


NHS Cancer Screening Programmes





Publication Type



PDF Document


3 stars


3 stars

Find: Similar

Contact us about this summary

Your comment or question: